Crunch Time!

Good intentions...are often just that, and no more, as it doesn't always get done. No less, either, as most of the time, people do intend to do what they say, but then life gets in the way. What are we to do, when we rely on others for something and they let us down (in one way or another)? Do we take charge, running over everyone else in the process, but getting the mission accomplished? Or do we sit back, hoping for something to happen, while our mission remains incomplete? Or better yet, do we attempt to stimulate action, but only find that we have not hit the correct "motivation" button?

In the end, when it comes down to "crunch time", the mission must be completed - it cannot remain unfinished. That leaves someone to take the "burden" of work on their shoulders, regardless of how much effort they have already poured into the project. This can cause some frustrations amongst team members, especially if there isn't enough communication regarding these issues, but ultimately, what can one person do? Besides complete the project him/herself, one member cannot control what the others do, and so it becomes a question of how those good intentions...were only good intentions, and not a reality.

Searching for that "Diamond"?

It's amazing how much information is on the internet. Really! If you do a search on just about anything, you'll usually get thousands to millions of results! Now, if we want information at our fingertips, this is the answer, but how do we sort through it all? How do we find the "diamond in the rough"?

Just like traditional library research, good online research takes time effort and focus to produce good results. It's not often that the first search result is exactly what we're looking for, or even the first page or two (or ten!). While using specific search terms can be effective, even that doesn't guarantee good results - we also need to be mindful of the sites we get our information from. Just because "somebody's" blog somewhere (hehe...like this one?) says something is true, doesn't mean that we should take it at face value - but it doesn't mean that we should automatically discredit the information either.

Teaching students these important methods of researching online is essential! For although students may think that the internet has made their research assignment easier, they may find that the amount of information they have to sift through before they discover the real "gems" is more than they bargained for.

All in all, this week has been a lot of research - searching, sifting, scanning, exploring, and saving - hoping to stumble upon the "answer" to my questions, while realizing that often the real answer isn't out there in the way you want it. More often, it's a combination of many thoughts and ideas that you have to consolidate and piece together for it to really make sense.

Scheduling Teamwork: Hit or Miss?

One of the benefits of online learning is that you can complete assignments within your own schedule. If evenings are good for you, you can do the required work in the evenings. If weekends are your only free time, it's possible to catch up on assignments and do most of the work on weekends. This type of asynchronous environment enables all sorts of people to take classes and continue their education when it may not have otherwise been possible.

This is all well and good when the assignments are based on individual completion, but what happens when the team/group assignments come around? All of a sudden you have people with different schedules, preferences, and external demands that prohibit coming together at the same time to get work done. How can teams function in this situation? What happens when the "team" work becomes a conglomeration of "individual" work thrown together by one or more team members?

First, consensus is hard to gain - when a team tries to make a decision and members are at different stages of making the decision, or getting involved in the decision, one might plow ahead while another is left in the dust. Second, the project becomes heavily influenced by the ideas of one or two team members instead of having major contributions from all members of the group. While there is still opportunity for later contributors to add to the project, if they wait too long, there is not ample time to change the direction that the initial members started going.

One way a team member might deal with this situation is to edit out anything they don't like and replace with their own ideas, but this is not a good suggestion if they are looking to gain the respect and trust of their group. Another option is to assume the role of editor, as opposed to researcher or writer, contributing to the team project in a different way due to their schedule restraints. Is this a problem? Not necessarily, as long as each of the team members feel that everyone is pulling their weight in some way throughout the project - problems come when the "late comers" can't figure out what's going on and then leave the work to the ones that started it.

If you think about the real world, however, you may find that virtual work teams operate in much the same way. While they may find the time to get together on a conference call, most of the time is working on their own, as they are able. Some have more time than others, contribute more than others, or in different ways. The leader often does most of the work in guiding and forming the process, but may not always be the one to tie up the loose ends. At the end of the day, one might say that the most important part of a team is the result they produce, which is valuable, but have they increased or decreased their chance of working well together again? That is a question only the process (not the result) can answer.